專八閱讀訓練:Analysis and Interpretation of the News
Analysis and Interpretation of the News
The newspaper must provide for the reader the facts, unalloyed, unslanted, objectively selected facts. But in these days of complex news it must provide more; it must supply interpretation, the meaning of the facts. This is the most important assignment confronting American journalism—to make clear to the reader the problems of the day, to make international news as understandable as community news, to recognize that there is no longer any such thing (with the possible exception of such scribbling as society and club news) as “l(fā)ocal” news, because any event in the international area has a local reaction in manpower draft, in economic strain, in terms, indeed, of our very way of life.
There is in journalism a widespread view that when you embark on interpretation, you are entering choppy and dangerous waters, the swirling tides of opinion. This is nonsense.
The opponents of interpretation insist that the writer and the editor shall confine himself to the “facts”. This insistence raises two questions: What are the facts? And: Are the bare facts enough?
As to the first query. Consider how a so-called “factual” story cones about. The reporter collects, say, fifty facts; out of these fifty, his space allotment being necessarily restricted, he selects the ten, which he considers most important. This is Judgment Number One. Then he or his editor decides which of these ten facts shall constitute the lead of the piece (This is important decision because many readers do not proceed beyond the first paragraph.) This is Judgment Number Two. Then the night editor determines whether the article shall be presented on page one, where it has a large impact, or on page twenty-four, where it has little. Judgment Number Three.
Thus, in the presentation of a so-called “factual” or “objective” story, at least three judgments are involved. And they are judgments not at all unlike those involved in interpretation, in which reporter and editor, calling upon their general background, and their “news neutralism,” arrive at a conclusion as to the significance of the news.
The two areas of judgment, presentation of the news and its interpretation, are both objective rather then subjective processes—as objective, that is, as any human being can be. (Note in passing: even though complete objectivity can never be achieved, nevertheless the ideal must always be the beacon on the murky news channels.) Of an editor is intent on slanting the news, he can do it in other ways and more effectively than by interpretation. He can do it by the selection of those facts that prop up his particular plea. Or he can do it by the pay he gives a story—promoting it to page one or demoting it to page thirty.
1. The title that best expresses the ideas of this passage is
[A] Interpreting the News. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[B] Choosing Facts.
[C] Subjective versus Objective Processes. [D] Everything Counts.
2. Why does the writer of an article select ten out of 50 available facts?
[A] Space is limited. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?[B] His editor is prejudiced.
[C] The subject is not important. [D] He is entering choppy and dangerous.
3. What is the least effective way of “slanting” news/
[A] Interpretation. [B] His editor is prejudiced.
[C] Placement. ? ? ?[D] Concentration.
4. Why should the lead sentence present the most important fact?
[A] It will influence the reader to continue.
[B] It will be the best way to write.
[C] Some readers do not read beyond the first paragraph.
[D] It will gratify the editor.
答案詳解(反白可見):
1. A. 解釋新聞。文章雖提及兩個領(lǐng)域(見難句譯注4),但重點在解釋(見難句譯注2)。提供是“解說”的前提,但作為標題不合適,因為它是作為“解釋”的對比而寫的。(見難句譯注3 not at all unlike…及難句譯注4 are both objective rather than…)
B. 選擇事實。這只是提供新聞中一個具體步驟。 C. 主觀對客觀過程。也是一個具體方面(見難句譯注4)。 D. 一切都要算在內(nèi)。涉及面太廣,文內(nèi)沒提及。
2. A. 版面空間有限。第四段三句:“舉例說,記者收集50條新聞事實。他從50條中選出10條他認為是最重要的新聞,因為他的版面空間分配必定有所限制。”
B. 他的編輯有偏見。不對。 C. 他的文章主題不重要。 不對。 D. 他進到了波浪滔天的危險水域(見難句譯注2)。這是講新聞解釋。
3. A. 解說。最后一段最后三句:“如果編輯想要歪曲新聞,他可以采用其他辦法,遠比解說要有效的多。他可以通過選擇支持他的觀點的才,或通過他給每條新聞所定的位置達到歪曲的目的——提升到頭版,或者降低到三十版?!边@段話說明其它辦法歪曲新聞比解說新聞來歪曲有效的多。
B. 選材。 C. 定位。 D. 集中。
4. C. 有些讀者不讀一段以下的問心,這是常識。有的讀者就讀大標題。
A. 它將影響讀者繼續(xù)讀下去。 B. 這是最佳的寫作方法。 D. 這會使編輯高興。