【專八interview系列】第八期 (2/4)
來源:滬江聽寫酷
2014-05-04 04:00
Hints:
holistically
I see. When did the concept begin to change?
In the late 1940s, the WHO challenged this physically and medically oriented view of health. They stated that health was a complete state of physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease. The mind, body and spirit of a person were seen holistically.
How long did this concept last?
It lasted until the 1970s. At that time, people focused their attention on the prevention of disease and illness by emphasizing the importance of the lifestyle and behavior of the individual. Specific behaviors which were seen to increase risk of disease, such as smoking, lack of fitness and unhealthy eating habits, were targeted. Creating health meant providing not only medical health care, but health promotion programs and policies which would help people maintain healthy behavior and lifestyles.
It sounds reasonable. It must have been beneficial to people.
Unfortunately, not.
But why?
You see,this individualistic healthy lifestyles approach did help the wealthy members of the society. But the majority were people experiencing poverty, unemployment or little control over the conditions of their daily lives. How could people afford the program if they lived under unfavorable social and environmental factors?
我明白了。這個概念是什么時候開始轉變的呢?
在20世紀40年代后期,世界衛(wèi)生組織質疑這種生理上和醫(yī)學導向的健康觀念。他們聲稱健康是生理上、心理上和社交上的完整狀態(tài),不僅僅指沒有疾病。應該整體地看待一個人的精神、生理和情緒。
這個概念持續(xù)了多久?
直到20世紀70年代。在那個時期,人們注重預防疾病,通過強調個人生活方式和行為的重要性。被認為會增加患病率的特定行為,比如吸煙,不健康的飲食習慣,都是預防目標。創(chuàng)造健康意味著不僅要提供醫(yī)療保健,而且要提供能幫助人們保持健康的行為和生活方式的健康促進計劃和政策。
聽上去很合理??隙▽θ藗冇泻艽髱椭桑?非常不幸的是,沒有。
為什么?
這種個人主義的健康生活方式的途徑確實幫助了富有的社會成員。但是,大部分的人們都經(jīng)歷著貧窮,事業(yè)或者無法維持日常生活。如果他們過著社會和環(huán)境因素都低下的生活,怎么能支付得了這個計劃的費用?