犯罪類真題

【Some?people?believe?that?there?should?be?fixed?punishments?for?each?type of?crime.?Others,?however,?argue?that?the?circumstances?of?an?individual crime,?and?the?motivation?for?committing?it,?should?always?be?taken?into account?when?deciding?on?the?punishment.?Discuss?both?these?views?and?give your?own?opinion.】

文章用了超多的難詞~聽寫難度略高了喲~

學(xué)習(xí)愉快喵~O(∩_∩)O~

Fixing punishments for each type of crime has been a debatable issue. There are many arguments supporting both views, those for and those against fixed punishment. On the one hand, fixed punishments will have a deterring effect on society. Individuals knowing that they will be subject to a certain punishment if they are convicted with a given crime, will reconsider committing this act in the first place. This deterring effect also leads to social stability and security, through minimizing the number of crimes committed. If people knew they would be able to convince the court or the jury of a reason for having committed the crime they are accused of, penal decisions would be largely arbitrary. This would result in criminals getting away with their crimes and into a high level of injustice caused by the subjective approach of different courts.
是否將對每種罪行的判罰固定下來一直是一個有爭議的話題。支持與反對雙方的看法都各自有很多人支持。 一方面來說，固定量刑對犯罪行為有一定的抑制作用。這樣每個人就會在起初要施行犯罪時考慮如果觸犯法律后將會面臨的處罰后果。 這種對犯罪的抑制效果也一樣會通過將犯罪行為的數(shù)量最小化來增加社會的穩(wěn)定性和安全性。 如果人們知道他們可以通過說服法官來改變對自己的刑罰，那么這種判決在很大程度上就變得十分主觀了。這會使得有些罪犯可以逃脫責(zé)罰，并且會造成由于不同法庭的主觀差異而導(dǎo)致的司法不公。